From
what I've noticed, Calvinists tend to affirm three ideas:
(1) God is loving and good
(2) Some people will go to Hell
(3) God is completely sovereign over salvation
In my opinion, Calvinists need to choose which one of these three ideas to get rid of. They try to affirm all three, but they can really only affirm two of them at once. If God is truly loving and yet some people will still go to Hell, then God must not be completely sovereign over salvation (in other words, He must allow human beings some say in the matter). If God is loving and completely sovereign over salvation, then no one should end up going to Hell (Calvinists really should be universalists, in my opinion). If some people will go to Hell and God is completely sovereign over salvation, then God must not be really be loving.
In other words...
If (1) and (2), then not (3).
If (1) and (3), then not (2).
If (2) and (3), then not (1).
I'd be interested in hearing any ideas anyone has as to how to reconcile all three, because at this point I can't do it.
It seems to me that the one Calvinists are most willing to jettison first is (1) – the idea that God actually loves everyone. That disturbs me. That is the LAST one I'd be willing to stop affirming. The one I think it makes the most sense to let go of – or at least the one that we need to have a more nuanced understanding of – is (3).
Thoughts?
(1) God is loving and good
(2) Some people will go to Hell
(3) God is completely sovereign over salvation
In my opinion, Calvinists need to choose which one of these three ideas to get rid of. They try to affirm all three, but they can really only affirm two of them at once. If God is truly loving and yet some people will still go to Hell, then God must not be completely sovereign over salvation (in other words, He must allow human beings some say in the matter). If God is loving and completely sovereign over salvation, then no one should end up going to Hell (Calvinists really should be universalists, in my opinion). If some people will go to Hell and God is completely sovereign over salvation, then God must not be really be loving.
In other words...
If (1) and (2), then not (3).
If (1) and (3), then not (2).
If (2) and (3), then not (1).
I'd be interested in hearing any ideas anyone has as to how to reconcile all three, because at this point I can't do it.
It seems to me that the one Calvinists are most willing to jettison first is (1) – the idea that God actually loves everyone. That disturbs me. That is the LAST one I'd be willing to stop affirming. The one I think it makes the most sense to let go of – or at least the one that we need to have a more nuanced understanding of – is (3).
Thoughts?